This was fun and cleaver. Though I’ll admit my interest waned after 30-40 chickens. Maybe some kind of other incentive would allow for more staying power — combo multipliers (eg combine 4 chickens or make an L shape etc). Points, progress, etc.
Thanks for sharing this!
.jpg)
This is very addicting,nice one!
Edit:
Update! Got addicted and frustrated, so here is a version for everybody else finding themselves in a similar position:
Nice game, but I'm feeling there's something missing : I don't see a path to victory at all.
Graphics could have been 16x16 for a 6x6 grid.
I was thinking there had to be a system of bags, where the 32 possible pieces (or maybe only 16 and the orientation is random for example) would be drawn from, and the trick to win would have been to use that to your advantage, just like with many versions of the tetris RNG, for example.
That would have made sense, especially with 368 being a multiple of 16 (23x16).
So I played a few games while noting the pieces I got, and the result seem to be just fair draw among 32 pieces, with the notable spikes that reject the bag hypothesis.
Did you win your game yourself ? Am I missing some strategies aside from the simple one to set pieces to maximize the number of pieces among the 32 that lead to a line ?
Why 368 ?
[Please log in to post a comment]
